NH ConstitutionGrow the Grassroots!Granite Roots NewsletterFair Elections FundUser loginStay in Touch with your Public Servants!Hands-On Elections HandbookCounting the VotesWe're Counting the Votes Kit Or send your check to DFNH, PO Box 717, Concord, NH 03301 Who's onlineThere are currently 0 users and 81 guests online.
NavigationVoting in NHElection Training from the NH Dept. of StateBlogs
Democracy for AmericaDaily Kos
Syndicate |
Civil rightsBlack Box Voting on why the DOJ decision on ES&S-Diebold merger won't stop evoting industry problems
Here's a quick analysis of the possible impact of the USDOJ antitrust decision:
The acquisition by ES&S of Diebold's Premier Election Solutions has been (supposedly) nixed by the US Department of Justice on antitrust grounds. However, the DOJ erred by not acting promptly to protect the Premier Elections operation from being gutted by ES&S. The Dept. of Justice claims that the deal flew under the radar so they couldn't stop the pillaging of Premier in time. That's not the case. The records will show that the Dept. of Justice had received -- and acknowledged -- formal complaints in time to put a protective halt on the mass firings of Premier employees. HERE'S WHY THIS ERROR IS SO SIGNIFICANT: The USDOJ failed to act to protect the assets of Diebold's Premier Elections unit, resulting in the problem that they now cannot mandate full divestiture of Premier by ES&S, and instead have ordered ES&S to remove itself from Premier's current locations only partially -- or perhaps, not at all. By admin at 03/09/2010 - 16:22 | Civil rights | Corporations | Fair elections | login or register to post comments | read more
Frank Schaeffer on the Military Religious Freedom FoundationMarch 6, 2010, By Joan Brunwasser For a long time, I've been fascinated by the MRFF, the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, especially after I read founder Mikey Weinstein's book. I recently learned that best-selling author and former evangelical Frank Schaeffer is on their advisory board. I interviewed him several months ago, so I invited him back today. Welcome to OpEdNews, Frank. Let's start at the very beginning. Can you tell our readers what MRFF is? MRFF's role is to ensure that our government does indeed adhere to the spirit as well as the letter of the Constitution; that it leads by example when it comes to not allowing the military to become a place where religion takes residence as if in a church! Mikey Weinstein, who founded it, has a passion to protect us from the pitfall of allowing fundamentalists to hijack our military in order to 1) convert soldiers and 2) use our military as a platform for missionary work world-wide. Ellsberg: The Patriot Act legalizes Nixon's crimesSOURCE: OpEdNews February 23, 2010 By Joan Brunwasser More Ellsberg: The Pentagon Papers and John Dean, Then and Now
My guest today is "the most dangerous man* in America" whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg. When you released the Pentagon Papers to the New York Times, you knew that you could be facing life in prison. Luckily, that turned out not to be the case. But, if you were to have done comparable actions since the passage of the Patriot Act, they would have tossed you in prison and thrown away the key. That's a sobering, concrete example of where we are almost forty years later. Do you ever think about that?
And even before the Patriot Act, the trend of legal opinions--the terrible judgments in the Samuel Loring Morison case in 1984, an increasing disregard of legislative history which had weighed against using the Espionage Act as an Official Secrets Act--was against the chances for a future leaker of classified information. The Patriot Act itself didn't affect this situation that much. It doesn't include an Official Secrets Act--almost by oversight--though another 9-11 could almost surely get us one, even from Obama. However, the Patriot Act and related legislation do have the effect of legalizing most of the actual crimes against me by Nixon. Sneak-and-peek entries and burglaries of a doctor's office, in search of information to use against a "terrorist suspect"? (i.e., someone like me who opposes and resists a president's terrorism). Legal, now. Warrantless wiretaps? Legal. Use of CIA against an American citizen? Legal. By admin at 03/01/2010 - 09:34 | Accountability | Civil rights | Crime | Fair elections | Features | login or register to post comments | read more
Annette Vander Ploeg: We were first responders to Haiti's earthquakeSOURCE: OpEdNews February 17, 2010 Annette Vander Ploeg: We Were First Responders to Haiti's Earthquake By Joan BrunwasserWelcome to OpEdNews, Annette. Last month, you were either in the right place at the right time or the wrong place at the wrong time. Please tell our readers why you were in Haiti in the first place. I was one of 23 people who were on a team sponsored by Little by Little, (liitlebylittlehaiti.org) a nonprofit foundation focusing on pediatric medical care. Started by Sue Walsh, a nurse practitioner who teaches at UIC, groups of medical personnel (and non-medical, like myself) have been going several times a year for five years. This was my first year. We had been there a week, planning on leaving the 13th when the quake hit on the 12th. Building a Culture of Peace and Nonviolence ConferenceSat, 03/13/2010 - 8:30am Concord High School, 170 Warren Street, Concord, NH Saturday, March 13, from 8:30 am to 12 noon: Building a Culture of Peace and Nonviolence Conference at Concord High School, 170 Warren Street, Concord NH. Workshop titles include: The Global Movement to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, Getting Out of Afghanistan, Peace with Justice for Israel and Palestine, Truth in Military Recruiting, Iraq Update, Resisting the War Machine, Abolishing the Death Penalty, and more. Suggested donation of $10 includes lunch. Sponsored by NH Peace Action Education Fund, NH American Friends Service Committee, Seacoast Peace Response, Concord High School Peace Club, Durham Students for a Democratic Society, Pace e Bene Nonviolence Service NE, and UCC Peace with Justice Task Force. For more information contact will@nhpeaceaction.org or 603-228-0559 or see www.nhpeaceaction.org. -- By rmoore at 02/17/2010 - 20:23 | Accountability | Civil rights | Terrorism | War | login or register to post comments | calendar
Deprivation under cover of law.
Deprivation of rights under color of law is a well-recognized, if not frequently prosecuted crime. Indeed, the Federal Bureau of Investigation has a comprehensive explanation and some interesting statistical data, including a list of the most common categories in which these crimes occur:
• excessive force;However, that's not the topic I want to address today. I want to focus on what I call "deprivation of rights under cover of law." But, first it seems important to consider what "deprivation" means. By monica smith at 02/09/2010 - 10:27 | Civil rights | Corporations | Crime | Privacy | Trade | monica smith's blog | login or register to post comments | read more
The Obama brand: Feeling good while they rob you blind?SOURCE: Alternet.org BY Chris Hedges The Obama Brand: Feel Good While Overlords Loot the Treasury and Launch Imperial Wars | Brand Obama makes us hopeful. We like our president and we believe he's like us. But we're being duped into doing a lot of things that are not in our interest. January 25, 2010 Editor's Note: The following is an adapted excerpt from Chris Hedges' book, Empire of Illusion: The End of Literacy and the Triumph of Spectacle (Nation Books, 2009) that first appeared in Tikkun magazine. Barack Obama is a brand. And the Obama brand is designed to make us feel good about our government while corporate overlords loot the Treasury, armies of corporate lobbyists grease the palms of our elected officials, our corporate media diverts us with gossip and trivia, and our imperial wars expand in the Middle East. Brand Obama is about being happy consumers. We are entertained. We feel hopeful. We like our president. We believe he is like us. But like all branded products spun out from the manipulative world of corporate advertising, this product is duping us into doing and supporting a lot of things that are not in our interest. By admin at 02/02/2010 - 08:01 | Accountability | Civil rights | Corporations | 1 comment | read more
Roger Shuler on recent Supreme Court decisionSOURCE: OpEdNews ebruary 1, 2010 Roger Shuler on Recent Supreme Court Decision By Joan Brunwasser Roger Shuler is an Alabama journalist and The Legal Schnauzer blogger. Welcome back to OpEdNews. The big news of late is the recent Supreme Court decision striking down limits on corporate campaign contributions. Everyone feels strongly about it. How about you, Roger? My primary interest is how it possibly reflects on the apparent political prosecutions of the George W. Bush Justice Department. In the Paul Minor case in Mississippi, Minor's attorneys have already raised the Citizens United v. FEC ruling in their motion for reconsideration with the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.All sidesseem to agree that a quid pro quo--something for something deal--remains illegal. But Minor's attorneys argue that there was no quid pro quo in his case, and the jury instruction did not require one. Therefore, based on Citizens United, the prosecution and conviction that Minor faced was aviolation of his First Amendment rights. By admin at 02/01/2010 - 09:12 | Accountability | Civil rights | Fair elections | Features | login or register to post comments | read more
Message from the DNC in honor of MLK dayBy admin at 01/18/2010 - 01:05 | Civil rights | Fair elections | Video | Voter registration | login or register to post comments
Out of town hate mongerers find out they're not in Kansas anymore
SOURCE: WMUR
Anti-Gay Group Outnumbered By Counter-Protesters 3 Members Of Group Raise Signs Outside Concord High School POSTED: 12:14 pm EST January 4, 2010 CONCORD, N.H. -- Members of a Kansas group advocating hatred of gays were far outnumbered by counter-protesters outside Concord High School on Monday. The group the Westboro Baptist Church had planned a demonstration against New Hampshire's new same-sex marriage law. Only three members of the group appeared outside Concord High School, where they were met by students, staff and members of the community. Because of the group's strong views and inflammatory rhetoric, police were present, but at the high school it remained a war of words and signs, much to the relief of the principal, who said he feared some sort of verbal confrontation. "The awkward part is that this was planned for the first day back, so there was no real opportunity to the kids beforehand," said Principal Gene Connolly. 200 Years and Counting--Adultery in New Hampshire Still a Crime
SOURCE:BlueHampshire
200 Years and Counting--Adultery in New Hampshire Still a CrimeRead More By monica smith at 12/21/2009 - 07:32 | Civil rights | Family | Privacy | login or register to post comments
Healthcare: First they came for the bankstersSOURCE: OpEdNews December 17, 2009 Healthcare: First They Came for the Banksters By Thom Hartmann With apologies to Pastor Niemoeller: First they came for the banksters, and showered them with money and put them in the Administration in a way that was not change we could believe in. Then they came for the military industrial complex, and sent more and more of our children to die in faraway lands that had never attacked us in a way that was not change we could believe in. And now they've sold out our hope for a national health care system not run by millionaire gangsters in suits. And who is left to speak for us? President Obama is playing the Bill Clinton game of throwing people a bone and telling them it's steak. Perhaps he's doing it because he thinks it's his only choice; perhaps it's because he's surrounded himself with Bill Clinton advisors (and Hillary as Secretary of State); whatever the reason, while it worked for Clinton, it won't work for Obama. By admin at 12/18/2009 - 10:04 | Accountability | Civil rights | Health care | login or register to post comments | read more
Major victory for ACORN and the ConstitutionSOURCE: Salon.com By Glenn Greenwald In September, I interviewed Rep. Alan Grayson about the unconstitutionality of Congress' attempt to de-fund ACORN, and a couple of weeks later, examined Supreme Court precedent -- principally the 1946 case of U.S. v. Lovett -- that left little doubt that the Congressional war on ACORN violated the Constitutional ban on "bills of attainder." Yesterday, in a lawsuit brought by the Center for Constitutional Rights, Federal District Judge Nina Gershon of the Eastern District of New York found Congress' de-funding of ACORN unconstitutional and enjoined its enforcement. This is a major victory not only for ACORN, but also for the Constitution. The priorities of a failed state: War and banksters over healthcare and homes
In a failed state, the government’s priorities are totally separate from those of the people. The US can’t afford health care or a bailout for jobless homeowners, but it can afford a pointless war and multi-million dollar bonuses for banksters who wrecked the economy.
SOURCE: Counterpunch.com The Twin Frauds of Obama By PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS Goldman Sachs senior executives are arming themselves with New York gun permits, according to Alice Schroeder on Bloomberg.com. The banksters “are now equipped to defend themselves if there is a populist uprising against the bank.” One can understand why the banksters are worried. The company, now known as Gold Sacks, has a large responsibility for the financial crisis and the fraudulent “securities” that wrecked the world economy and Americans’ pensions. A former Gold Sachs CEO had control of the US Treasury during the Bush regime from which he diverted $750 billion to bail out the banks, thus supplying them with free capital. Gold Sachs made $27,000 million during the first three quarters of 2009 and is paying out massive bonuses, leaving the busted taxpayers with the debt and interest charges. By admin at 12/06/2009 - 18:26 | Accountability | Civil rights | Corporations | Economy | War | login or register to post comments | read more
The Prince of Darkness: Blackwater CEO links himself to CIAVisit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy By admin at 12/04/2009 - 16:51 | Accountability | Civil rights | Corporations | War | login or register to post comments
Citizens United, corporate personhood and the ConstitutionSOURCE: Constitutional Accountability Center As we await the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, expected any day now, Constitutional Accountability Center (CAC) has continued to build on the scholarly research discussed in our brief filed with the Court: whether corporations have the same rights as individuals, particularly when it comes to influencing electoral politics in this country. The result of this work is this discussion draft, tentatively titled “A Capitalist Joker”: Corporations, Corporate Personhood, and the Constitution, which we intend to release more formally in January as the latest installment in our Text & History Narrative Series. The text of our Constitution never mentions corporations and, as our narrative explains, this was deliberate: the framers wrote and the American people ratified the original Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the three Civil War amendments — the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth — to secure the inalienable rights of “We the People” — living human beings. Governments create corporations and give them special privileges to fuel economic growth, but with these special privileges come greater government oversight. Indeed, in the early 20th Century, the American people added the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Amendments to the Constitution, at least in part, to ensure greater governmental control over corporations and less corporate influence over our democracy. By admin at 12/04/2009 - 08:15 | Civil rights | Corporations | Fair elections | login or register to post comments | read more
Siegelman: Justice Department hasn't changed under ObamaSOURCE: Legal Schnauzer How has the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) changed now that George W. Bush is gone and President Barack Obama is in charge? It hasn't changed, says former Alabama Governor Don Siegelman. And that's distressing news for progressives who hoped to see accountability for the Bush officials who used the DOJ as a political weapon. It's particularly distressing for Siegelman, who is perhaps the most high-profile victim of a Bush-era political prosecution. But what other conclusion can Siegelman reach? He recently saw U.S. Solicitor General Elena Kagan, an Obama appointment, file a brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court not to hear the Siegelman case. In so many words, Kagan is saying, "The Bush DOJ, probably at Karl Rove's direction, got the Siegelman case right based on the facts and the law." That is an outrage, and Siegelman seemed to have a hard time controlling his anger in a recent interview with TPM Muckraker. Reports TPM:
"There's really been no substantial change in the heart of the Department of Justice from the Bush-Rove Department of Justice," Siegelman tells TPMmuckraker in an interview. By admin at 12/03/2009 - 10:57 | Accountability | Civil rights | login or register to post comments | read more
Blackwater: Murderous Crusaders for ChristThis is what happens when you privatize your government
By admin at 12/02/2009 - 08:38 | Accountability | Civil rights | Corporations | Crime | Video | login or register to post comments
Palast: EXCLUSIVE: World Trade Organization risks financial 'China Syndrome'WTO STILL PARTIES LIKE IT'S 1999 Monday, November 30, 2009 GENEVA — Apparently, one meltdown isn't enough for the World Trade Organization. They meet today in Geneva on the tenth anniversary of the "Battle in Seattle," when tens of thousands of people from around the world protested the organization's practices. By admin at 11/30/2009 - 13:26 | Accountability | Civil rights | Economy | login or register to post comments | read more
Lincoln, Marshall, and the ConstitutionMon, 11/30/2009 - 7:00pm New Hampshire Institute of Politics at Saint Anselm College Frank J. Williams, a leading scholar on Abraham Lincoln and former chief justice of the Supreme Court of Rhode Island, will offer a lecture titled Lincoln, Marshall, and the Constitution. Williams will analyze current events in the context of Lincoln and the Civil War. He will draw parallels between Lincoln's treatment of the Constitution during the Civil War and President Bush's after 9/11. When: Tonight, November 30, 2009 Time: 7:00 p.m. Where: New Hampshire Institute of Politics at Saint Anselm College Cost: FREE Contact: Ann Camann at (603) 222-4103 or acamann@anselm.edu |
US ConstitutionAction AlertsBrowse eventsUpcoming events
Election IntegrityFeature storiesPopular contentToday's: |