<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com">
<channel>
 <title>Democracy for New Hampshire - Federal Election Legislation</title>
 <link>http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com/taxonomy/view/or/274</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Stealing America vote by vote</title>
 <link>http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com/node/view/6017</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Over the last decade,
millions of votes have disappeared. &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A nation can be stolen without guns or tanks.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A nation can be stolen vote by vote.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Direct Cinema Limited presents a Concentric Media Film:&lt;strong&gt; STEALING AMERICA Vote
by Vote &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; A new feature length documentary film &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; Narrated by PETER COYOTE, Original music LAURENCE ROSENTHAL, Produced and
  Directed
by Oscar-nominated, Emmy-winning Filmmaker, DOROTHY FADIMAN &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;September 12th - September 18 &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Majestic Hometown Theater &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt; 36 Main Street Conway Village &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.StealingAmericaTheMovie.org" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.StealingAmericaTheMovie.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Compelling, meticulously accurate, poignant&amp;#8230;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; First-person stories from the election trenches paint a chilling picture
of problems affecting election outcomes, &amp;quot;glitches&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;irregularities&amp;quot; which
cannot be explained away as random errors.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 12:08:05 -0400</pubDate></item>
<item>
 <title>The new Holt Bill: supporting corporate controlled secret vote counting</title>
 <link>http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com/node/view/5645</link>
 <description>&lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.alternet.org/images/site/logo.gif" alt="AlterNet" align="middle" border="0" height="59" width="173"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
          &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;"Emergency" Bill Tries to Make Electronic
            Voting More Accurate, But Will It? By Steven Rosenfeld, AlterNet,  Posted on April 3, 2008, Printed on April 3, 2008&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
           &lt;p&gt;SOURCE: &lt;a href="http://www.alternet.org/story/81163/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;Alternet.org&lt;/A&gt;
             &lt;p&gt; Efforts to improve the machinery that will count the 2008 presidential
            vote fell prey to a classic Washington compromise on Wednesday, when
            a House committee approved a bill giving money to both opponents
            and supporters of controversial paperless electronic voting systems.&lt;/p&gt;
          &lt;p&gt;The "Emergency Assistance for Secure Elections Act of 2008," or
            H.R. 5036, now goes to the House floor, where its goal is helping
            cities and counties create a "verifiable" paper trail and audits
            for individual votes cast for president and Congress.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 21:20:35 -0400</pubDate></item>
<item>
 <title>Legal Basis for Impeachment, The State's Role</title>
 <link>http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com/node/view/5543</link>
 <description>John Kaminski of Maine Lawyers Guild has explored the legal basis  for impeachment petitions submitted by a State Legislature.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="/files/Kaminski-Memo.pdf" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;Download a PDF file of his Memo to NH House of Representatives&lt;/a&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:32:57 -0400</pubDate></item>
<item>
 <title>DOJ threatens takeover of New York's elections</title>
 <link>http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com/node/view/5003</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;SOURCE: &lt;a href="http://www.nyvv.org/newdoc/doj/PR110607.pdf" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;New Yorkers for Verified Voting&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;League of Women Voters of New York State &amp;#8226; New York Public Interest Research
Group, NYPIRG &amp;#8226; New Yorkers for Verified Voting&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;  News Release&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Civic Groups Blast Department of Justice Proposal to Gut Standards
  for New Voting Systems&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; A Federal Takeover for Selecting New Voting Systems Not in Best Interest
  of New York Voters&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Groups say&lt;br&gt;
  A coalition of civic groups harshly criticized a proposal made by the Department
      of Justice today that calls for the federal courts to consider taking control
      from the state and to select new voting systems for New York for the September,
      2008 primary elections. The groups said DOJ's position endangered numerous
      safeguards for new voting systems that were won in state law, such as mandating
      that the
      computer code from voting systems be held in escrow in case of suspected
      problems with machines.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 08:51:58 -0500</pubDate></item>
<item>
 <title>Dept. of UnJustice in voting rights</title>
 <link>http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com/node/view/4888</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;SOURCE: &lt;a href="http://nationaljournal.com/carney.htm" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;National Journal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RULES OF THE GAME
  Voting Rights Controversy Another Mess For DOJ, By &lt;a href="mailto:ecarney@nationaljournal.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Eliza Newlin Carney&lt;/a&gt;, NationalJournal.com&lt;br&gt;
© National Journal Group Inc.&lt;br&gt;
  
  Monday, Oct. 22, 2007
  
  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; U.S. District Court Judge &lt;b&gt;Michael Mukasey&lt;/b&gt; will have a very big mess
  to clean up at the Justice Department if he is confirmed, as expected, to be
  attorney general. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
 
If confirmed as attorney general, Mukasey's first step should be to replace
John Tanner. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; Among the many problems Mukasey will have to fix is Justice's questionable
  handling of voting rights, which department officials have arguably set out
  to suppress rather than protect. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; As American Civil Liberties Union leaders put it in a &lt;a href="http://www.aclu.org/safefree/general/32166leg20071012.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;recent
    letter&lt;/a&gt; to the Senate Judiciary Committee, the department's Civil Rights
    Division has not only failed to advance civil liberties -- it "has even gone
    so far as to switch sides from defending the civil rights of minority plaintiffs
    to opposing them." &lt;/p&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 06:07:47 -0400</pubDate></item>
<item>
 <title>Congressional chaos with election reform</title>
 <link>http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com/node/view/4702</link>
 <description>&lt;img src="http://www.allhatnocattle.net/crdpo070919.gif"&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:59:13 -0400</pubDate></item>
<item>
 <title>No to Holt-HR811! Paper, not vapor, please</title>
 <link>http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com/node/view/4694</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Do the right thing by calling, emailing, and faxing or mailing your Representatives
with this simple message:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;#8220;I urge you to restore the use of paper ballots which are counted in
  public on election night in all Federal elections. I am very concerned about
  this serious issue, and I hope that you will take immediate action to protect
  democracy instead of undermining democracy. Please do not support the Holt
  bill, and instead, support Congressman Kucinich&amp;#8217;s bill calling for hand
  counted paper ballots. Thank you.&amp;#8221;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SOURCE: &lt;a href="http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_mark_ada_070919_how_to_take_action_o.htm" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;OpEdNews
  &lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;September 19, 2007&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How to Take Action on Holt and Fix Our Elections&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By Mark Adams&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I represented Clint Curtis, John Russell, and Frank Gonzalez in contesting
  their alleged losses in 2006 in Florida State court and in the U.S. House of
  Representatives. Our contest was instrumental in exerting the pressure to
  pass a paper ballots law in Florida which at least gives us something to
  count if someone can find an attorney who will file a lawsuit or a contest.
  However, these contests were dismissed WITHOUT any review of the evidence
  and contrary to the law as well as the rights of the candidates and voters
  to have the votes counted.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 09:03:06 -0400</pubDate></item>
<item>
 <title>Holt Bill paper trail a charade, will not improve security</title>
 <link>http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com/node/view/4682</link>
 <description>&lt;em&gt;Laying to rest the mythological cornerstone of the Common Cause, Move-On, PFAW, True Majority-supported Holt Bill (HR811), the IT industry explains the fallacy of HR811's paper trail promise. No friends of hand count paper ballot system, the group recommends even more costly and insecure computerized solutions! Nonetheless, this report represents the broad consensus that can be found among disparate groups with differing philosophies against the Holt Bill paper trail proposal. &lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
SOURCE: &lt;a href="http://www.infoworld.com/article/07/09/18/Group-says-e-voting-paper-trail-would-not-improve-security_1.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;InfoWorld.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Group says e-voting paper trail wouldn't improve security&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation says that paper trails will add cost but not security, though many analysts disagree with the assertion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By Grant Gross, IDG News Service&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
September 18, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Requiring print-outs as a back-up to electronic voting machines would not improve security but would increase costs of U.S. voting systems, according to a report released Tuesday.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:27:13 -0400</pubDate></item>
<item>
 <title>11 state and local organizations reject Holt Bill (HR811)</title>
 <link>http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com/node/view/4680</link>
 <description>National Governors Association (NGA)&lt;br /&gt;
National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS)&lt;br /&gt;
National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL)&lt;br /&gt;
Council of State Governments (CSG)&lt;br /&gt;
National Association of Counties (NACo)&lt;br /&gt;
National League of Cities (NLC)&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Conference of Mayors (USCM)&lt;br /&gt;
National Association of Towns and Townships (NATaT)&lt;br /&gt;
National Association of Election Officials (Election Center)&lt;br /&gt;
National Association of County Recorders, Election Officials and Clerks (NACRC)&lt;br /&gt;
International Assn of Clerks, Recorders, Election Officials and Treasurers (IACREOT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
September 18, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dear Speaker Pelosi and Majority Leader Hoyer:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The undersigned organizations representing state and local governments across the nation respectfully urge you to resist bringing H.R. 811, the “Voter Confidence and Increased Accessibility Act of 2007”, to the House floor during the first session of the 110th Congress. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The majority of states already require a voter-verified paper record of every voter’s vote.  H.R. 811 would preempt those laws, requiring states to replace equipment they purchased to comply with the Help America Vote Act of 2002 – even if it already offers a voter-verified paper trail – with technology that does not exist yet.  As a result, it imposes an unfunded federal mandate of unknown proportions.  In addition, it contains unnecessary and overly broad requirements for many states to enact hasty changes to their voting laws in the 14 months remaining between now and the 2008 Presidential election.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:14:21 -0400</pubDate></item>
<item>
 <title>MICROSOFT 811: the Microsoft election reform bill</title>
 <link>http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com/node/view/4678</link>
 <description>SOURCE: &lt;a href="http://www.voiceofthevoters.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;                                                                Coalition for Voting Integrity &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
H.R. Microsoft 811 Challenges Our Voting Rights and Democracy Itself!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"So what I agreed to... I didn't do the negotiations but I understand what they were doing, so I shouldn't say I agreed to them... but I accept the outcome." -Rep Rush Holt&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unfortunately, the committee that made this change heard from Microsoft&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They heard that voice Rep Rush Holt&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We present a debate with Rep. Rush Holt on Microsoft 811 using the words of Congressman Rush Holt (NJ) captured on video at a Town Meeting in his district in July 2007. .  Since Mr. Holt and major supporters of Microsoft 811 refuse to debate, then we must use Mr. Holts own comments to reply and question.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Holt:    The confidence in the working of our elections has been shaken badly. There are literally millions of Americans who don't believe the results of recent electionsin certain elections.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:32:23 -0400</pubDate></item>
<item>
 <title>Rep. Hodes Statement on the Signing of Landmark Lobbying Reform Legislation</title>
 <link>http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com/node/view/4672</link>
 <description>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calls Bill “A Real Step Towards Draining the Swamp in Washington”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Rep. Hodes released the following statement today on the Honest Leadership, Open Government Act of 2007, which President Bush signed into law late Friday afternoon:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“The Honest Leadership, Open Government Act is a real step towards draining the swamp in Washington,” Congressman Hodes said.  “Everyone remembers the lobbying and pay-to-play scandals that rocked Congress in recent years. It is past time that we limited the influence of lobbyists over legislators and started rebuilding the American peoples’ trust in their leaders.  We are putting the Jack Abramoffs of the world out of business.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This new law is the most sweeping lobbying and ethics reform in a generation and has been hailed by reform groups and newspapers as a “sea change” and “landmark reform” and “the most sweeping overhaul of congressional ethics rules since Watergate.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Last year, I said that I would do everything I could to put an end the culture of corruption in Washington,” Representative Hodes said.  “This legislation delivers on that promise.”</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 13:07:01 -0400</pubDate></item>
<item>
 <title>HR811: In Holt's own words, three short videos</title>
 <link>http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com/node/view/4613</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Congress is poised to pass another phony bill. Like the &amp;quot;Patriot Act&amp;quot;,
  designed to strip civil liberties from American patriots and other free citizens
  of the world, or the &amp;quot;Clear Skies Initiative&amp;quot;, designed to allow
  corporations to pump more poisons into our heavens. The &amp;quot;Voter Confidence
  Act&amp;quot;, or HR811, or the Holt Bill, is being brought to the House floor
  today. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Learn more about this dangerous legislation from its prime sponsor, Congressman
  Rush Holt himself. View these three short videos, taken from a town meeting
  with Congressman Holt's constituents in July 2007.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is his bill good for the nation? You be the judge.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=nAmji1msSWU" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;Microsoft811 (5 minutes)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
  
    
    
    
    
    &lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/nAmji1msSWU" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;
  
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 07:57:09 -0400</pubDate></item>
<item>
 <title>MICROSOFT 811</title>
 <link>http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com/node/view/4605</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;By Mary Ann Gould

&lt;p&gt;Holt: &amp;quot;It's no longer my bill.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a town meeting in his New Jersey home district in July, Congressman Rush
  Holt made some disturbing statements which leave no doubt that H.R. 811 has
  become a bill that protects the interests of software corporations over the
  rights of citizens. In fact the Holt bill is NOT the Holt bill anymore! It
  has become 'Microsoft 811'!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mr. Holt: &amp;quot;The bill has been changed since I introduced it. It's no longer
  my bill -- well, it's still my bill but it's been marked up in committee.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Further he added:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Unfortunately, the committee that made this change heard from Microsoft.
  They heard that Voice. The point is Microsoft did lobby strongly. It wasn't
  just Microsoft. It was everybody who-&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Audience question: &amp;quot;Diebold?&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Holt: &amp;quot;No, it was software -- the software industry.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is something seriously wrong when a U.S. Congressman can say that an
  election reform bill he introduced was significantly changed through the lobbying
  effort of Microsoft and the software industry....that their voices were heard!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 12:39:59 -0400</pubDate></item>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft 811 - Safety For Voting Machine Vendors</title>
 <link>http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com/node/view/4602</link>
 <description>&lt;b&gt;Opinion: Michael Collins&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://img.scoop.co.nz/stories/images/0709/ea5d6deb6bef1d5c96c6.jpeg" height="173" width="200"  align="left"&gt;&lt;br&gt;
© 2004-06
  Rand Careaga/salamander.eps, With Permission&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;strong&gt;At a New Jersey town meeting this July, Rep. Rush Holt (D-NJ) said
  of his bill, &lt;a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/home/gpoxmlc110/h811_rh.xml" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;House
  Resolution 811&lt;/a&gt;, "It’s not my bill anymore." &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why shouldn't the world be safe for vendors? Microsoft in particular? After
  all, they pay the bills. Just let them have whatever they want and let the
  rest of us be thankful we’ve got jobs. This is the prevailing philosophy in
  Washington, DC, your capitol and the supposed heart of modern democracy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;House Resolution 811 ("The Holt Bill") is coming up for a vote this week,
  word has it. The questions are stark. What will our Congress be voting for?
  Whose interests are represented in the final mark up of this legislation?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 08:56:56 -0400</pubDate></item>
<item>
 <title>MoveOn Shows Their Bias Again, In Another Flawed Poll</title>
 <link>http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com/node/view/4601</link>
 <description>SOURCE: &lt;a href="http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_rob_kall_070901_moveon_shows_their_b.htm" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;OpEdNews&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
September 1, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By Rob Kall&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the third or fourth time Moveon has run a bogus poll, setting up the answer by providing incomplete, biased information, this time on a bad bill it looks like they want to support. So they leave out key information, ask members to vote, and if they do, based on the info Moveon provides, it looks like moveon got member support. Shame on Move on.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 08:49:42 -0400</pubDate></item>
</channel>
</rss>
