<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com">
<channel>
 <title>Democracy for New Hampshire - Voting in NH</title>
 <link>http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com/taxonomy/view/or/272</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>BradBlog: "'Hello,' They Lied: NH, TX Sec. of State Officials Continue to Deceive Voters"</title>
 <link>http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com/node/view/5754</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;SOURCE:  &lt;a href="http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5982#more-5982" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;The BRAD BLOG&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/b&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;'Hello,' They Lied: NH, TX Sec. of State Officials Continue  to Deceive Voters&lt;/p&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;TX Official Claims 'Machines Not Faulty'; NH Official
      Claims Not to Know Whether They Use Same Diebold Op-Scan Voting System
      Seen Hacked in HBO Documentary (It Was)...&lt;/p&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;Posted By &lt;u&gt;Brad Friedman&lt;/u&gt; On 13th May 2008 @ 13:13
      
      &lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.BradBlog.com/Images/DieboldAccuVoteOS_PollTape_HackingDemocracy_CluelessNH.jpg" align="right" border="0" hspace="6" vspace="3"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Miller-McCune's&lt;/i&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.miller-mccune.com/article/371" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;David
          Rosenfeld files a good story&lt;/a&gt; (1) on the dreadful state
          of the hackable, insecure, error-prone machinery --- both DRE/touch-screen
          and paper-based optical scan --- still used across our electoral landscape
          in 2008.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;p&gt;Despite a few small-ish errors, Rosenfeld succeeds where so many before
        him have been unable: Properly quoting both the scientists and Election
        Integrity experts who know what they're talking about, while giving fair
        opportunity to respond from voting machine company and elected officials
        who are either in denial, uninformed, or simply willing to lie.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 10:10:31 -0400</pubDate></item>
<item>
 <title>NH's Diebold (S)elections: Does everyone but the NH Dept of State "get it"?</title>
 <link>http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com/node/view/5753</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Clueless in NH? Or just pretending to be? Claiming ignorance is not only absurd but a complete abrogation of responsibilities required in the job. &lt;/strong&gt;  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;New Hampshire is another state that, even when faced with the irrefutable
    evidence, has retained vote-counting machines fraught with risks. Computer
    scientist
    Hursti, who was featured in Hacking Democracy,
    even went to New Hampshire and testified before the Legislature. The same
    Diebold Accuvote optical scanner shown in the film was used to count more
    than 80 percent
    of the ballots in the state's December primary, said &lt;strong&gt;David Scanlan,
    New Hampshire's deputy secretary of state.&lt;/strong&gt; "I know we use an Accuvote," Scanlan told Miller-McCune.com. "I'm
    not technical enough to tell you whether it's the same one that was used
    in the film, but it's possible." 
  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;SOURCE: &lt;a href="http://www.miller-mccune.com/article/371" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.miller-mccune.com&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Faulty Machines Ready to Count Your Vote&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 10:10:50 -0400</pubDate></item>
<item>
 <title>BBV: Diebold is controlling OUR elections</title>
 <link>http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com/node/view/5730</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;SOURCE: &lt;a href="http://www.blackboxvoting.org/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.blackboxvoting.org&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My records show that YOUR elections district uses the Accuvote voting machine. This is the system hacked in the HBO "Hacking Democracy" film, being shown TODAY on HBO. It also goes by the names "Diebold", "Premier", "Global Election Systems" optical scan or OS. Your voting system uses both the Diebold /Premier machines and the GEMS program for BOTH mailed in votes and polling place votes. It is the Diebold/Premier Accuvote optical scansystem that you will see on HBO, altered in the blink of an eye to change election results without leaving a trace.&lt;p&gt;
The film "Hacking Democracy", showing exactly how my organization, Black Box Voting, actually rigged a voting system like the one your votes are counted on. You'll understand this quite painlessly by viewing the detective story as it unfolds, on HBO or YouTube. The film will be shown on HBO on May 2, 4, 10, 12, 14, 17, 18, 23, 29, 25, 26 and June 16 -- mostly during daytime hours. Note that several of these showings are on weekends.&lt;p&gt;
Scroll down for NEW INFORMATION on how this voting system may affect you personally in the Nov. 2008 election, and what to do about it.&lt;p&gt;
If you don't have HBO, you can view HACKING DEMOCRACY for free in nine 10-minute segments at YouTube:</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 17:01:06 -0400</pubDate></item>
<item>
 <title>BlackBoxVoting Investigates NH Recount: Manchester Ward 5: INFLATED VOTE TOTALS</title>
 <link>http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com/node/view/5719</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GYz9O_SvIJI&amp;hl=en&amp;color1=0xcc2550&amp;color2=0xe87a9f" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;BY Jeannie Dean&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;p&gt;JANUARY 24, 2008...
&lt;p&gt;DAY 1 of the NEW HAMPSHIRE REPUBLICAN RECOUNT continues with ANOMALY after gross ANOMALY: MANCHESTER WARD 5, a DIEBOLD COUNTED ward of great interest due to the massive INFLATED VOTE RESULTS yielded from the original Diebold Counted results on election night to the hand RECOUNT results.

&lt;p&gt;This video explores NH State Office's very strange, and even UNLIKELY, explanation for the anomaly, leaving us with more questions than answers...

&lt;p&gt;ED NOTE: This video is not for the faint at heart. This was, by far, the most complex and textured video I've ever tried to birth; like a demon baby invetro, it has been haunting me above all others...</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:39:33 -0400</pubDate></item>
<item>
 <title>Video: April 18th Ballot Law Commission hearing on NH recount</title>
 <link>http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com/node/view/5711</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Parts 1 &amp; 2 below...
&lt;p&gt;Part 1&lt;br&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/jSZ1bMZxm0Q&amp;hl=en&amp;color1=0x2b405b&amp;color2=0x6b8ab6&amp;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="373"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Part 2&lt;br&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/vLBHkmVX6yw&amp;hl=en&amp;color1=0x2b405b&amp;color2=0x6b8ab6&amp;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="373"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:50:24 -0400</pubDate></item>
<item>
 <title>NH Recount Feb 6 Concord or Keene? NO SEALS!</title>
 <link>http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com/node/view/5710</link>
 <description>&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0xRltWnJQ7k&amp;hl=en&amp;color1=0x2b405b&amp;color2=0x6b8ab6&amp;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="373"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:37:32 -0400</pubDate></item>
<item>
 <title>GOP Candidate Howard gives a no-show at Ballot Law Commission, shutting down challenge to NH Primary results</title>
 <link>http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com/node/view/5697</link>
 <description>&lt;em&gt;Updated April 21 by ntobi: Video evidence of the Commission "hearing" last Friday discloses that the Secretary of State filed a motion to dismiss stating that the petition to appeal did not fit within the bounds of the Dept. of State's understanding of reasons a candidate can appeal a recount to the Commission. As expected by the voting rights advocacy community who have been following this story, the Secretary of State had intended to use this motion to short circuit the hearing by contending that the Commission would only review "contested ballots" from the recount. No more, no less. Because NH's election laws are so unacceptably ambiguous, the Secretary of State could certainly make this contention. However, given the statements from&lt;a href="http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com/node/view/5454" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt; Mr. Howard's petition to appeal, &lt;/a&gt; had he decided to follow through with it, Mr. Howard's could just have easily contended that - in fact - ALL the ballots in the recount were being contested due to the absolute absence of ballot security and a secure ballot chain of custody, the absolute absence of any procedures to reconcile numbers of ballots printed and distributed with the numbers of ballots cast, the absolute absence of procedures to reconcile numbers of ballots cast with numbers of voters checked in, and the absolute failure of the Dept of State to follow state law requiring the delivery of secure ballot containers to NH cities and towns. The Dept of State may well feel they have dodged this bullet. But dodging bullets is not a strategy to ensure election integrity. The eyes of the nation have been startled by what they witnessed during the conduct of the NH recount. Voting rights advocates nationwide continue to analyze the numbers, documents, and data coming from the recount. This story is far from over.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:11:47 -0400</pubDate></item>
<item>
 <title>The Myth of Verified Voting: How GOP strategists &amp; J. Abramoff transformed America's elections and the reform movement itself</title>
 <link>http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com/node/view/5668</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;BY Nancy Tobi&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/print_friendly.php?p=opedne_nancy_to_080411_the_myth_of_verified.htm" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;Printer Friendly version&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;For the published version of this article and more about elections in  21st century America,
      read the newly released&lt;u&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Loser-Take-All-Subversion-Democracy/dp/0978843142/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1207915264&amp;sr=1-1" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt; Loser
  Take All&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/u&gt;, edited by Mark Crispin Miller.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;The Myth of Verified Voting: How GOP strategists and Jack Abramoff transformed
      America’s elections and the election reform movement itself&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;K Street Lobbyists and Election Reform&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In 1995, House Majority Leader Tom DeLay and Republican strategist Grover
  Norquist launched the “K Street Project.” (i) Named
  for the Capital Hill street housing many lobbying firms, the Project gave lobbyists
  direct access to Washington lawmakers through weekly policy and
  strategy meetings. The most infamous K Street lobbyist was Jack Abramoff, who
  worked for the firm Greenberg Traurig. Abramoff, now in prison, took money
  from his American Indian tribe clients, and laundered it to Congressional Representatives
  in return for legislative and policy favors aligned with the Project’s political
  agenda.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But this was not just any money laundering enterprise. Abramoff’s dry cleaner
  was converting money to election fraud. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 11:46:07 -0400</pubDate></item>
<item>
 <title>Election Integrity Activists Statement Regarding Candidate Albert Howard's NH Recount Appeal</title>
 <link>http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com/node/view/5664</link>
 <description>For Immediate Release -- Election Integrity Activists Statement Regarding Candidate Albert Howard's NH Recount Appeal&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
April 10, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Albert Howard, the Republican candidate on whose behalf we wrote the Petition for Appeal of the New Hampshire recount, yesterday severed his ties with the election integrity volunteers from EDA, the Coalition for Visible Ballots, and several other groups who have been offering assistance regarding the upcoming April 18th hearing with the Ballot Law Commission.  He has indicated that he has secured his own attorneys and prefers to move forward without our involvement or assistance. We take that to include all our support, data, evidence and witnesses. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Given Mr. Howard's recent YouTube video initiating a fund raising campaign for a million dollars "to start off with" for legal fees in his recount battle, claims he has made regarding the recount appeal process and potential outcomes, concerns about his methodologies and other aspects of his behavior, we have determined that severing all ties with him is in the best interests of our election integrity community as well.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:54:57 -0400</pubDate></item>
<item>
 <title>NH Election lockdown begins: the "official" response to NH recount investigations</title>
 <link>http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com/node/view/5661</link>
 <description>&lt;em&gt;NH officials have decided to respond to the evidence exposed by citizen watchdogs in the NH recounts pointing to serious breaches in security, procedures, and laws. Yes boys and girls, they are going to make things even less transparent.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SOURCE:&lt;a href="http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080406/COLUMNISTS12/213410867/-1/columnists" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;Nashua Telegraph&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Getting recount may get harder&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Albert Howard, you could be the last also-ran candidate for president to get a statewide recount of the primary vote.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Ann Arbor, Mich., Republican received only 44 votes in the primary on Jan. 8, but New Hampshire law allows any finisher to request a recount. Those who don’t come within 3 percent of the winner have to pay for it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As The Sunday Telegraph first reported, Howard got the $60,000 to make the request from an online fundraising effort led by a hard-core North Carolina supporter of GOP candidate Ron Paul, a Texas congressman.</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 14:04:27 -0400</pubDate></item>
<item>
 <title>Analysis: e-voting's success rests on chain-of-custody issue</title>
 <link>http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com/node/view/5660</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;For a real-world case where the ballot chain-of-custody issue was a complete and unmitigated disaster, look no further than last month's New Hampshire state primaries. Bev Harris and her team of activists went to New Hampshire with cameras in hand, and they captured on video a perfect storm of arrogance, indifference, and incompetence on the part of New Hampshire's elections officials.....If you're a member of the media who's covering the elections beat, then grill elections officials about chain of custody and report the results to the public. The "hacking" stories may sell papers and draw traffic, but chain-of-custody issues are just as critical. And if you're a concerned citizen, then get involved.... &lt;/em&gt;

&lt;p&gt;SOURCE: &lt;a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080221-analysis-evotings-success-rests-on-chain-of-custody-issue.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;Ars Technica&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Analysis: e-voting's success rests on chain-of-custody issue

&lt;p&gt;By Jon Stokes | Published: February 21, 2008 - 05:41AM &lt;strong&gt;CT&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 12:43:29 -0400</pubDate></item>
<item>
 <title>BlackBoxVoting Investigates NH Recount: 3-28-08: Chain of Custody Investigation: Ballot washing?</title>
 <link>http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com/node/view/5646</link>
 <description>&lt;Strong&gt;&lt;p&gt;BY BEV HARRIS&lt;P&gt;SOURCE: &lt;a href="http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/1954/73352.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;BlackBoxVoting.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;An original investigation by Black Box Voting&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Last week, I described a way to alter ballots using the techniques used to
  remove ink from old, archival paper documents and old books. Archivists and
  custodians of rare books and documents are generally familiar with these techniques,
  because they are needed to restore documents.
&lt;p&gt;These techniques have been adapted by modern-day criminals to "wash" the writing
  off of checks, and this is why it's dangerous to send checks by putting them
  in your mailbox with the little red flag up. Criminals have learned that they
  can remove the ink -- the amount written and the payee -- without disturbing
  the information printed on your check by the bank.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;BALLOT WASHING&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Archivists know this technique as a document repair method, criminals know
  it as "check washing." If you have the right chemicals, can you remove votes
  from ballots, allowing election-riggers to "re-vote" the ballots before they
  are counted, recounted, or audited?
&lt;p&gt;Yes. We have been able to remove votes marked in ink from ballots without
  leaving a trace. Using this technique, insiders can alter votes on ballots.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;HAVE INSIDERS EVER ACTUALLY BEEN CAUGHT TAMPERING WITH BALLOTS?&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yes. We now know that an aide to Maine Speaker of the House John Martin, together
  with a legislative aide, pleaded guilty in 1994 to rigging ballots in a recount
  structured almost identically to the New Hampshire presidential primary recount.
  Ballots had been packed up in cardboard boxes "sealed" with tape (a practice
  that the media called "an invitation to ballot-rigging") and transported to
  a central location for a recount.
&lt;p&gt;The state attorney general and the Maine secretary of state were criticized
  for stonewalling the investigation after the insiders were caught red-handed,
  and the speaker of the house was not prosecuted, though he was alleged to have
  had inside information. The ballot-riggers got a few months in jail, a $2000
  fine, and a sentence for community service. At least one of the perps did not
  pay all of his fine nor complete his community service requirement. Next time
  you're told to "trust" election insiders, laugh at that, ignore the advice,
  and keep asking sensible follow up questions!
&lt;p&gt;In response to this "ballot-gate" scandal, the state of Maine invested $60,000
  in more secure ballot boxes and changed policy to store them in an evidence
  vault used to secure evidence in pending criminal cases.
&lt;p&gt;New Hampshire has known of this incident for at least 14 years, but failed
  to act to secure its own ballots.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/1954/73353.jpg" alt=""&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 17:03:23 -0400</pubDate></item>
<item>
 <title>BlackBoxVoting investigates NH Recount: Election Reality TV: Face to Face with the Recount Guys</title>
 <link>http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com/node/view/5642</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Bullitt County, Kentucky citizen Kathy Greenwell confronts the New Hampshire Secretary of State face to face; an investigator is hired - he interrogates the citizens instead of investigating violations of election law; Hoppy speaks out
&lt;p&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GrdzXp3Zbmk&amp;color1=0x402061&amp;color2=0x9461ca&amp;border=1&amp;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="373"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 21:46:14 -0400</pubDate></item>
<item>
 <title>BlackBoxVoting investigates NH Recount: Election Reality TV: 9 Minutes on the Road w. Butch &amp; Hoppy</title>
 <link>http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com/node/view/5641</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A dizzying trip following the New Hampshire ballot pickup van as "Butch &amp; Hoppy" collected ballots for the 2008 recount of the presidential primary -- you decide: Evasive manuevers or can't find a map? 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/710FyJkflDA&amp;color1=0x006699&amp;color2=0x54abd6&amp;border=1&amp;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="373"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 21:40:41 -0400</pubDate></item>
<item>
 <title>BlackBoxVoting Investigates: NH Recount - State orders police dogs to keep citizen observers at bay during ballot delivery</title>
 <link>http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com/node/view/5599</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;SOURCE: &lt;a href="http://blackboxvoting.org/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt; BlackBoxVoting.ORG&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Election Reality TV: The Jeannie Dean video&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Police dogs assigned, ballots in the dark, and the State of New Hampshire denies having any information about the K-9 Unit assignment. Then changes their mind when this video hits YouTube, says they are "looking for the records." Sarasota citizen Jeannie Dean provides graphic evidence about the state of your democracy right now. And if you still believe citizen sovereignty is intact, Google "Thomas Jefferson" and see if you still believe this is what the founders meant to create. 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/pwovSqXWKQ8&amp;color1=0x5d1719&amp;color2=0xcd311b&amp;border=1&amp;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="373"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 11:10:57 -0400</pubDate></item>
</channel>
</rss>
