E-voting Ponzi scheme reaps huge rewards for government insiders

SOURCE: BlackBoxVoting.ORG

(US) 5/09 - NATIONAL: FORMER FED BIGSHOT CASHING IN ON INTERNET VOTING -

YOU CAN DISCUSS THIS HERE:
http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/8/80431.html

For must-read, original reporting by Brad Friedman, with crucial details omitted by the Hawaiian press, hit this Bradlink: http://www.bradblog.com/?p=7184.

And now, the BLACKBOX BACKSTORY on the BRADSTORY:

During the 1980s, local mom & pop election vendors, who were selling their local services and goods to local election officials, began to come under centralized control through corporate consolidation under Business Records Corp (BRC), later acquired by Election Systems & Software (ES&S).
http://www.blackboxvoting.org/bbv_chapter-8.pdf

In the 1990s, efforts to centralize control over election administration were put under an organization called NASED (National Association of State Election Directors), at one point led by Washington State Secretary of State Ralph Munro.

In 2002, the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) shifted NASED's power to the Election Assistance Commission (EAC), a handful of White House appointees.
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_nancy_to_061003_the_eac_certificatio.htm

Former NASED guy Ralph Munro violated Washington ethics law by taking over one of the first Internet voting vendors, VoteHere, just days after stepping down as secretary of state and in violation of Washington's three-year required quarantine. VoteHere struggled despite Munro's muscle, and after much citizen action, ultimately flopped. Must-watch video showing two Washington State construction workers, Tim White and Alan Rosato, taking on VoteHere: http://www.blackboxvoting.org/video.html#secretballot
(They sued, helped block a huge King County purchase, and pounded a final nail into VoteHere's coffin.)

Now comes a new Internet voting company called "Everyone Counts," and its Chief Operating Officer, Paul DeGregorio just stepped down from chairing the EAC. This "Everyone Counts" (translation: "We will count your vote in secret") system was recently used for elections in the state of Hawaii.

For details on DeGregorio and the latest push towards Internet voting, read the full article at Bradblog -- an outstanding piece of investigative reporting.
Bradblog - May 28, 2009, by Brad Friedman - http://www.bradblog.com/?p=7184
"Paul DeGregorio's 'Everyone Counts' was paid to carry out fully unverifiable, unsecure Internet, phone election in Honolulu . . . As if the former U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) chair Paul DeGregorio hadn't done enough damage to our nation's electoral system during his disastrous reign as a commissioner from 2003 to 2007, it looks like he's now more than happy to cash in . . ."

REMOVING THE FRAMEWORK FOR DEMOCRATIC ELECTIONS

Like rats following the piper, most mainstream press articles write glowingly over this new concept, as if it were a foregone conclusion that all of America will vote this way soon. By the way, the "foregone conclusion" method can be found in propaganda manuals. Don't believe it and do not tolerate it. Write letters to the editor and bring your backbone to public meetings if you see this thing coming near you.

The genius of democracy is dispersal of power. Consolidation of control under the EAC and secret, centralized counting under an Internet voting system combine to remove the framework for democratic elections.

While reading the Bradblog article, take note of how DeGregorio guts, propagandizes, and makes meaningless the term "transparency." This should serve as a reminder to ask for what we really want: Counting votes in public, with public controls in place.

(And did Hawaii's Internet voting even work?)

(HI) 5/09 - OVER 86 PERCENT CHOSE NOT TO E-VOTE -

YOU CAN DISCUSS THIS HERE:
http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/8/80429.html

Beware of vendors bearing spin. Only 6.3 percent of Hawaii's eligible voters cast votes on the new Internet-or-phone voting system (as compared with 28 percent in a similar election previously). This was a record low turnout. And the vendor says:

"Our systems aren't really about turnout. They're more about accessibility to participation."

Uh, that's right: These new Internet voting systems are about "accessibility to participate", rather than participation.

Beware of public officials and news articles spouting the company line. The election commission (and reporters) leap off the democracy boat altogether with this statement:

"The technology side, it works."

My self-cleaning oven works too, but it's not a democracy. For democratic elections to work, you need public controls, you can't count votes in secret, and you need participation. And on these three measures, the Internet-or-telephone voting system fails.

Mainstream news article about Hawaii's pretend-democracy Internet voting system:
The Associated Press - May 27, 2009, by Herbert A. Sample
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5i9NwLamF2ZyJwao1WNYbAoKEO2TAD98EV8N80
Low turnout mars Hawaii's digital vote

* * * * *

Black Box Voting conducts original research into voting rights issues throughout the USA, gets these issues covered by mainstream media, distributes key issues to activists nationwide, and mentors local citizens who take action.

If you believe investigation and public awareness is important, please consider making a tax-deductible donation (very much needed and appreciated!)
http://www.blackboxvoting.org/donate.html
or mail to:
Black Box Voting
330 SW 43rd St Suite K
PMB 547
Renton WA 98057