Use it or lose it.
Our Granite Roots
NH ConstitutionFair Elections FundUser loginGrow the Grassroots!Stay in Touch with your Public Servants!DFNH GearGranite Roots ArchivesHands-On Elections HandbookElection Training from the NH Dept. of StateCounting the VotesWe're Counting the Votes Kit Or send your check to DFNH, PO Box 717, Concord, NH 03301 NavigationWho's onlineThere are currently 0 users and 106 guests online.
BlogsLocal coalition groupsDemocracy for America
Daily KosSyndicate |
Senate Votes to Expand Spy Powers, from the NY Times
By ERIC LICHTBLAU
Published: February 13, 2008 WASHINGTON — After more than a year of wrangling, the Senate handed the White House a major victory on Tuesday by voting to broaden the government’s spy powers and to give legal protection to phone companies that cooperated in President Bush’s program of eavesdropping without warrants. One by one, the Senate rejected amendments that would have imposed greater civil liberties checks on the government’s surveillance powers. Finally, the Senate voted 68 to 29 to approve legislation that the White House had been pushing for months. Mr. Bush hailed the vote and urged the House to move quickly in following the Senate’s lead. The outcome in the Senate amounted, in effect, to a broader proxy vote in support of Mr. Bush’s wiretapping program. The wide-ranging debate before the final vote presaged discussion that will play out this year in the presidential and Congressional elections on other issues testing the president’s wartime authority, including secret detentions, torture and Iraq war financing. Republicans hailed the reworking of the surveillance law as essential to protecting national security, but some Democrats and many liberal advocacy groups saw the outcome as another example of the Democrats’ fears of being branded weak on terrorism. “Some people around here get cold feet when threatened by the administration,” said Senator Patrick J. Leahy, the Vermont Democrat who leads the Judiciary Committee and who had unsuccessfully pushed a much more restrictive set of surveillance measures. Among the presidential contenders... nytimes.com... One has to hope that the House has better sense than the Senate. By Mayme at 02/13/2008 - 09:27 | Civil rights | News | Rockingham/Strafford | login or register to post comments
|
US ConstitutionAction AlertsVoting in NHIraq War Casualty CountVideos
Election IntegrityElection Integrity ResourcesBrowse eventsUpcoming eventsFeature stories
|