Ask the Governor to VETO SB403

I am writing to ask your support in urging the Governor to VETO SB403. This bill as amended by a single party Committee of Conference, will, if passed into law require election workers to separate the affidavits of all voters registering on election day who do not have a photo ID. These affidavits will be segregated and the names of the voters will be marked on the voter registration database for follow up and possible investigation.

There are many good reasons for the Governor to veto the bill, not the least of which being that election workers in 2006 will be overwhelmed already with implementing two entirely new voting systems mandated by the federal government: a centralized voter registration database and a voting solution for persons with disabilities. This is not the year to create additional requirements, especially requirements that can have the effect of voter suppression if not properly carried out.

If the purpose is to counter voter fraud (despite the AG's diligent report, which showed that voter fraud is not a problem in NH), then we can work to pass new legislation next session that addresses voter fraud controls in a nondiscriminatory manner without embedded photo ID requirements. (For instance, random audits of same day registrants.)

Other reasons to ask for a veto include:

* There is no reason to suppose that possession of a photo ID implies increased security.
* Photo ID requirements for registration and casting of ballots result in voter suppression in a multitude of ways (poll tax, disparate treatment, etc.).
* There are at least 25,000 voters in NH who do not have a photo ID. Their rights to NH due process of election day registration should be no less than other NH voters.
* The bill that came out of Committee of Conference intentionally removed student (high school and college) IDs as a recognized form of photo ID. This indicates that the bill is designed to target a specific class of voter: students.
* The new process places an unnecessary burden on election officials already struggling with two significant changes to the election process (registration database and disability voting system).
* It is bad practice and bad democracy to segregate different classes of voters, and this is exactly what the bill does. It assumes that a voter with a photo ID is more trustworthy than one without, and it places the one without in a position to be subject to CRIMINAL investigation should they move after voting.
* There should not be one process for one group of voters and another process for other groups of voters.

Disclaimer: This is a personal statement and does not come from the DFNH Fair Elections Committee. ------------
TEXT OF BILL

May 18, 2006

2006-2325-CofC

03/04
Committee of Conference Report on SB 403, an act relative to verification of identity when a person registers or attempts to vote.

Recommendation:

That the Senate recede from its position of nonconcurrence with the House amendment, and

That the House recede from its position in adopting its amendment to the bill, and

That the Senate and House adopt the following new amendment to the bill as amended by the Senate, and pass the bill as so amended:

Amend the bill by replacing all after the enacting clause with the following:

­1 New Paragraphs; Determining Qualifications of Applicant; Identity; Verification. Amend RSA 654:12 by inserting after paragraph II the following new paragraphs:

III. To prove the qualifications set forth in paragraphs I and II, an applicant for registration as a voter must prove his or her identity to establish that the evidence used to prove age, citizenship, and domicile relate to the applicant. A person who has in his or her immediate possession a photo identification approved for use by paragraph II must present that identification when applying for registration. A person who does not have an approved photo identification with him or her may establish identity through any reasonable means, including, but not limited to: photo identification not approved by paragraph II, but determined to be legitimate by the supervisors of the checklist or clerk, verification of the person’s identity by another person registered as a voter and known to the supervisor or clerk, or completion of the affidavit to be completed by a challenged voter. Residents of a nursing home or similar facility may prove their identity through ver!
ification of identity by the administrator of the facility or by his or her designee. For the purposes of this section, the application of a person whose identity has been verified by an official of a nursing home or similar facility shall be treated in the same manner as the application of a person who proved his or her identity with a photo identification.

IV. Any person who is applying for registration as a voter and who is currently registered to vote in a different town or ward in New Hampshire shall complete the voter registration form provided for in RSA 654:7. If the election official receiving the application confirms through the centralized voter registration database required by RSA 654:45 that the applicant is currently registered to vote in New Hampshire, the applicant shall prove identity and domicile, but shall not be required to prove his or her age or citizenship.

V.(a) The election official approving the application for registration as voter of a person who does not present an approved form of photo identification as proof of identity when registering, shall mark the voter registration form to indicate that no photo identification was presented. The person entering the voter information into the centralized voter registration database shall determine if the person is listed in the system as having been previously registered in the town or ward reported by the applicant on the voter registration form. If the person is a new registrant who has not been previously registered anywhere in New Hampshire or if the centralized voter registration database does not confirm a previous registration claimed on the voter registration form, the election official shall cause the record created in the centralized voter registration database to indicate that the person is a new applicant in New Hampshire and that no photo identification!
was presented. When municipalities enter information on people who register on election day into the centralized voter registration database, to the extent practical applicants who are registering for the first time in New Hampshire and who also register without presenting an approved photo identification shall be entered first.

(b) The secretary of state shall cause a letter of identity verification to be mailed by first class mail to each voter identified as a first-time election day registrant in New Hampshire who also did not verify his or her identity with an approved photo identification. The secretary of state shall mark the envelope with instructions to the United States Post Office not to forward the letter and to provide address correction information. The letter shall notify the person that a person who was unable to present photo identification registered or registered and voted using his or her name and address and instruct the person to contact the attorney general immediately if he or she did not register and vote.

(c) The secretary of state shall cause any letters mailed pursuant to subparagraph (b) that are returned as undeliverable by the United States Post Office to be referred to the attorney general. Upon receipt of notice from a person who receives a letter of identity verification that the person did not register and vote, or upon receipt of a referral from the secretary of state, the attorney general shall cause an investigation to be made to determine whether fraudulent registration or voting occurred.

­2 Obtaining a Ballot; Verification of Age. Amend RSA 659:13 to read as follows:

659:13 Obtaining a Ballot. A person desiring to vote shall, before being admitted to the enclosed space within the guardrail, announce his or her name to one of the ballot clerks who shall thereupon repeat the name; and, if the name is found on the checklist by the ballot clerk, the ballot clerk shall put a checkmark beside it and again repeat the name. The ballot clerk shall state the address listed on the checklist for the voter, and ask if the address is correct; if the address on the checklist is not correct, the ballot clerk shall correct the address in red on the paper checklist and the supervisors of the checklist shall cause the centralized voter registration database to reflect the correction. The voter, if still qualified to vote in the town or ward and unless challenged as provided for in RSA 659:27-33, shall then be allowed to enter the space enclosed by the guardrail. After the voter enters the enclosed space, the ballot clerk shall give the voter one!
of each ballot to be voted on in that election which shall be folded as it was upon receipt from the secretary of state.

­3 Effective Date.

I. Section 2 of this act shall take effect September 1, 2006.

II. The remainder of this act shall take effect June 1, 2006.

2006-2325-CofC

AMENDED ANALYSIS



This bill:

I. Requires proof of identity by persons registering to vote and modifies certain procedures for voter registration applications.

II. Requires supervisors of the checklist to include election day changes of address in the centralized voter registration database.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.

Election fraud is not voter fraud

I am not sure what that forum is that you pointed us to, so I will answer here and thank you for explaining it on the other forum if you see fit.

The AG's report was investigating VOTER fraud, which refers to VOTERS who are perpetrating fraud against the system. The AG's report found that we do not have a problem with VOTER fraud in NH.

Our concern with the voting machines has to do with ELECTION fraud, which refers to tampering with the vote count or with the election. As you may know from the phone jamming scam, NH has its share of election fraud.

Additionally, if you read the information in the Counting the Votes Kit, and elsewhere on this website (look under the link on the right side of the site that says "election integrity"), you will learn that the machines in use in NH are highly risky for both failure and tampering.

So we are not trying to have it both ways, we are trying to deal with REAL problems and not fabricated ones.

Is there a voter fraud problem in NH or not?